On Monday 14 February 2005 12:12, you wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Nick Warne wrote: > > Are the optimize && ? lines normal? > > They are only debug prints, but I'm quite sure they are fixed in recent > versions. > > > This is from a current tree that has an uptime of > 50 days > > Could you specify "current tree"?
Yes, sorry, my bad wording. This is kernel 2.6.4 from kernel.org. I meant _my_ 'current' tree that runs perfect on the 233 box. I can't seem to upgrade to later 2.6.x kernels as I get curious swapd oops after a few hours, but that is another story. So I can ignore the debug prints? Thanks, Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
