If active_bases already has entry for a particular clock type, then we don't
need to rewrite it while queuing a hrtimer.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
Initially I thought of doing this but then thought better remove active_bases
completely and so didn't sent this one. Now it might find some place for itself
:).
kernel/hrtimer.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index da351ad..acfef5f 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -864,8 +864,9 @@ static int enqueue_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer,
{
debug_activate(timer);
+ if (!timerqueue_getnext(&base->active))
+ base->cpu_base->active_bases |= 1 << base->index;
timerqueue_add(&base->active, &timer->node);
- base->cpu_base->active_bases |= 1 << base->index;
/*
* HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED is or'ed to the current state to preserve the
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
