Robin wrote: > for the second process and then from node 8 to node 4 for the second.
"for the second ... for the second" I couldn't make sense of this statement. Should one of those seconds be a first; what word(s) are elided after the second "second"? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/