11.04.2014, 18:33, "Sasha Levin" <[email protected]>: > On 04/10/2014 09:38 AM, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > >> 10.04.2014, 11:00, "Michael wang" <[email protected]>: >>>> On 04/10/2014 11:31 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> [snip] >>>>>> I'd like to re-open this issue. It seems that something broke and I'm >>>>>> now seeing the same issues that have gone away 2 months with this patch >>>>>> again. >>>> A new mechanism has been designed to move the priority checking inside >>>> idle_balance(), including Kirill who is the designer ;-) >> Not sure, it's connected with my patch. But looks like, we forgot >> exactly stop class. Maybe this will help? >> >> [PATCH] sched: Checking for stop task appearance when balancing happens >> >> Just do it, like we do for other higher priority classes... >> >> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]> > > I've been running with this patch for the last two days and the hang > seems to be gone. > > I'll leave it running on the weekend and will update again on Monday.
Thanks for testing. Sorry for I killed your linuxes by this lost need_resched(). > > Thanks, > Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
