Hi All, There seems to be a mistake in this patch, please ignore it. I'll send a reworked one later.
Regards, Gu On 04/11/2014 05:49 PM, Gu Zheng wrote: > With the issue_list and dispatch_list, we can handle flush_merge > already, so remove the useless "issue_tail" list. > > Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <[email protected]> > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 - > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 ++--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index 2ecac83..90109fa 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -358,7 +358,6 @@ struct f2fs_sm_info { > struct flush_cmd *issue_list; /* list for command issue */ > struct flush_cmd *dispatch_list; /* list for command dispatch */ > spinlock_t issue_lock; /* for issue list lock */ > - struct flush_cmd *issue_tail; /* list tail of issue list */ > }; > > /* > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index 524b7ed..8a6fe2a 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ repeat: > spin_lock(&sm_i->issue_lock); > if (sm_i->issue_list) { > sm_i->dispatch_list = sm_i->issue_list; > - sm_i->issue_list = sm_i->issue_tail = NULL; > + sm_i->issue_list = NULL; > } > spin_unlock(&sm_i->issue_lock); > > @@ -250,10 +250,9 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > spin_lock(&sm_i->issue_lock); > if (sm_i->issue_list) > - sm_i->issue_tail->next = cmd; > + sm_i->issue_list->next = cmd; > else > sm_i->issue_list = cmd; > - sm_i->issue_tail = cmd; > spin_unlock(&sm_i->issue_lock); > > if (!sm_i->dispatch_list) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
