* Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:04:57 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:19:54 +0200
> > > Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > * Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > currently if AP wake up is failed, master CPU marks AP as not present
> > > > > in do_boot_cpu() by calling set_cpu_present(cpu, false).
> > > > > That leads to following list corruption on the next physical CPU
> > > > > hotplug:
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't this fix precede the main change to the smp bootup logic?
> > > >
> > > > Can this bug trigger with current upstream kernels?
> > > That's not impossible, tests showed that with current kernel there will
> > > be other problems due wild AP running around.
> > >
> > > I'll reorder patch anyway.
> >
> > So, could you please first make sure that with only the fixes applied
> > there's no problems left?
>
> Sure, I'll retest reordered series.
Please don't jus test a reodered series, but a 'fixes only' series,
which does not include patch #1.
We will apply that patch too, to improve the bootup of virtualized
environments, but we first want to know whether the 'baseline' is OK
and fixed 100%.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
