On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:53:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > __tick_nohz_task_switch() was called only from tick_nohz_task_switch() and > there > is nothing much in tick_nohz_task_switch() as well. IOW, we don't need > unnecessary wrapper over __tick_nohz_task_switch() to be there. Merge all code > from __tick_nohz_task_switch() into tick_nohz_task_switch() and move it to > tick-sched.c. > > This also moves check for tick_nohz_tick_stopped() outside of irq_save() > context.
No, the wrapper is there on purpose in order to optimize the full dynticks off case in the context switch path with the jump label'ed check on tick_nohz_full_enabled(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
