On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Torsten Duwe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This patch introduces a derating factor to struct hwrng for
> > the random bits going into the kernel input pool, and a common
> > default derating for drivers which do not specify one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <[email protected]>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > include/linux/hw_random.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux/include/linux/hw_random.h.orig
> > +++ linux/include/linux/hw_random.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> > * @read: New API. drivers can fill up to max bytes of data
> > * into the buffer. The buffer is aligned for any type.
> > * @priv: Private data, for use by the RNG driver.
> > + * @derating: Estimation of true entropy in RNG's bitstream
> > + * (per mill).
>
> I'll bikeshed again: this is a rating, not a *de*rating. Higher =
> more confidence, at least assuming the comment is right.
>
You're right. Would anyone object to call it "quality", as in RX signal quality?
In context of a random source that is pretty accurate, I'd say. Other opinions?
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
