On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:57:18PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > I'd say scrap (a) _unless_ we're going to add while (1) loops to all > > the architectures. Alternatively, we could just accept that > > machine_power_off() may return and deal with that case (iow, not > > crash) in generic code. > > What would the right behaviour be > > while(1); > > isn't really nice behaviour on a modern device
That's an entirely different question... one which also needs fixing in the hibernate code. We already know that cpu_relax() in there is a good thing to do, so that would be a good start. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/