On Sad, 2005-02-19 at 05:20, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > It means that padto has improved a lot (or the underlying allocators). > > It also still means the patch makes the code slower and introduces > > changes that have no benefit into the kernel, so while its good to see > > its not relevant its still a pointless change. > > So the verdict is to revert?
Not sure. The old code is known to work and a fraction faster, the new code makes the driver use the same logic as the others. Having seen the numbers from Paul I personally don't care either way. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
