On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 08:15:41 AM Lee Jones wrote: > > The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper > > for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. > > > > It should have no functional changes. > > > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <[email protected]> > > --- > > It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences > between the versions, so we can keep track. > > > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What > changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply > this one instead?
The reason why v4 was sent is because I asked for it. And if you applied [5/8] without [1/8], it won't work, because the macro is introduced by that patch. If that's the case, please drop [5/8] and let me handle the entire series. Kind regards, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
