On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 04:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:46:57AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>> According to lockdep a trylock should not fail on UP.
> >
> > Oh!? Where does it say that? A trylock can fail at all times.
>
> kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:
>
> int do_raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> int ret = arch_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock);
>
> if (ret)
> debug_spin_lock_after(lock);
> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> * Must not happen on UP:
> */
> SPIN_BUG_ON(!ret, lock, "trylock failure on UP");
> #endif
> return ret;
> }
>
> How can a trylock (spinlock, not mutex) fail on UP? That would mean the
> lock is not interrupt safe.
> Unless, you attempt to take the lock from interrupt context via trylock
> while in general you take the spinlock in process context with
> interrupts enabled.
But that's not lockdep. That's the spinlock debugging code, entirely
different beasts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
