> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Did some basic sanity checks with LTO and everything > > works (still need the three other LTO patches to build) > > Ok, this series looks much better. Thanks,
It seems this series hasn't made it to the torvalds tree yet so the
compiler still issues complaints about __visible static functions.
Should I bring a patch removing the "static" from asmlinkage-annotated
functions, or is this patch the better way? Or have I missed something?
BTW some of the functions have already lost their asmlinkage, see
commit 8783dd3a37a5853689e1a8fa728827a50905b912 ("irqchip: Remove
asmlinkage from static functions") in torvalds tree and also recent
thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/16/453 ("[PATCH] crypto:
sha{256,512}_ssse3 - remove asmlinkage from static functions"), both of
them because "it issues warnings".
MQ
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
