This was reported by IBM for 3.12, but if my analysis is right, it affects
current kernel as well as older ones.
So the question is: does anything protect the shrink list from concurrent
modification by one or more dput() instances?
E.g. two dentries are on the shrink list, for both dget(), d_drop() and dput()
are called. dput() -> dentry_kill() -> dentry_lru_del() -> d_shrink_del() ->
list_del_init(). Unlike the LRU list this is only protected with d_lock on the
individual dentries, which is not enough to prevent list corruption:
list->next = a, list->prev = b
a->next = b, a->prev = list
b->next = list, b->prev = a
CPU1: list_del_init(b)
__list_del(a, list)
a->next = list ...
CPU2: list_del_init(a)
__list_del(list, list)
list->next = list
list->prev = list
CPU1: (continuing list_del_init(b))
list->prev = a
Attached patch is just a starting point (untested). Not sure how to minimize
contention without adding too much complexity.
Thanks,
Miklos
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 40707d88a945..5e0719292e3e 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -357,10 +357,14 @@ static void d_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_lru_del(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru,
&dentry->d_lru));
}
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_shrink_lock);
+
static void d_shrink_del(struct dentry *dentry)
{
D_FLAG_VERIFY(dentry, DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST | DCACHE_LRU_LIST);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_shrink_lock);
list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_shrink_lock);
dentry->d_flags &= ~(DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST | DCACHE_LRU_LIST);
this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
}
@@ -368,7 +372,9 @@ static void d_shrink_del(struct dentry *dentry)
static void d_shrink_add(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
{
D_FLAG_VERIFY(dentry, 0);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_shrink_lock);
list_add(&dentry->d_lru, list);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_shrink_lock);
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST | DCACHE_LRU_LIST;
this_cpu_inc(nr_dentry_unused);
}
@@ -391,7 +397,9 @@ static void d_lru_shrink_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct
list_head *list)
{
D_FLAG_VERIFY(dentry, DCACHE_LRU_LIST);
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
+ spin_lock(&dcache_shrink_lock);
list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_shrink_lock);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
