On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > [2] "A special case can occur if an SMI handler nests inside an NMI > > handler and then another NMI occurs. During NMI interrupt > > handling, NMI interrupts are disabled, so normally NMI interrupts > > are serviced and completed with an IRET instruction one at a > > time. When the processor enters SMM while executing an NMI > > handler, the processor saves the SMRAM state save map but does > > not save the attribute to keep NMI interrupts disabled. > > Potentially, an NMI could be latched (while in SMM or upon exit) > > and serviced upon exit of SMM even though the previous NMI > > handler has still not completed." > > I believe [2] only applies if there is an IRET executing inside the SMM > handler, which should not normally be the case. It might also have been > addressed since that was written, but I don't know.
Is there any chance that Intel would reveal what's behind this paragraph and how likely it is to expect such BIOSes in the wild? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
