On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:06:16PM -0800, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 07:51:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Please give each patch a unique, descriptive subject. > > > > yup. > > > > > Summarizing what > > > each patch is doing in your 0/n so that reviewers can focus on the > > > bits that are interesting is also helpful. > > > > Actually, that's fairly irritating, because the 0/n contains useful info > > which someone has to go and massage and copy into 1/n. > > Certainly, there should be nothing in the summary that isn't already > in the patch itself. What I'm suggesting is more a table of contents: > > 1/6 move foo to bar so that we can then remove baz > 2/6 kill references to baz > ...
well, okay, that is in the comment at the start of the patch, (because it sometimes is rather lengthy) but I'll try to add something like a short version to the subject in the future ... thanks for the input! Herbert > > -- > Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
