> -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:45 PM > To: Haiyang Zhang > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan; o...@aepfle.de; > jasow...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; driverdev- > de...@linuxdriverproject.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] Add support for netvsc build without > CONFIG_SYSFS flag > > From: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com> > Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:41:33 -0700 > > > +static inline void netvsc_record_rx_queue(struct sk_buff *skb, > > + struct hv_netvsc_packet *packet, > > + struct net_device *ndev) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > > + skb_record_rx_queue(skb, packet->channel-> > > + offermsg.offer.sub_channel_index % > > + ndev->real_num_rx_queues); > > +#endif > > +} > > This is still fantastically gross, what is so unique about your driver that > it needs > hacks like this? No other driver to my knowledge does. > > Figure out what it is that makes your driver so unique, and try to make it > conform to how other drivers handle these features without SYSFS ifdef'ery > instead. >
I looked around the other drivers, and the netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() function. It's already switched to no-op without CONFIG_SYSFS flag. So I will rely on this, and don't have to handle the flag in my code. Thanks, - Haiyang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
