Hi Jiri,

On Thu, 8 May 2014 12:32:25 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:59:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +
>> +    if (!err && !file->is_pipe) {
>> +            rec->session->header.data_size += rec->bytes_written;
>> +
>> +            if (!rec->no_buildid)
>> +                    process_buildids(rec);
>> +            perf_session__write_header(rec->session, rec->evlist,
>> +                                       file->fd, true);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (signr != -1) {
>> +            signal(signr, SIG_DFL);
>> +            raise(signr);
>> +    }
>
> hum.. so we dont call perf_session__delete in case we propagate
> the signal.. also the outer function's cleanups are not called:
>
>         perf_evlist__delete(rec->evlist);
>         symbol__exit();
>
> the only cleanup I found that actually matters here and won't be
> called is 'vdso__exit' which removes the temp vdso library file.

Ah.. missed that.

>
> Maybe we could have one on_exit callback raising the signal
> if needed.. at the time we are sure we called all out cleanup
> functions.

Sounds like a good idea.  I'll send v6.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to