On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 11:08 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:49:22PM -0700, Jason Low wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 15:14 -0700, Jason Low wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, Peter, > > > > > > Were there NULL domains on the test system? If so, I think we can > > > address the problem by doing update_next_balance() only if the below > > > rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain() returns a non-null domain. > > > > Also, below is a patch which has the change: > > > > Thanks, and yes, NULL domains are a perfectly normal thing to have > (though not common on normal boot paths).
Okay. Likewise, on my test machine, I offline all but 1 CPU in order to try reproducing the issue. Thanks, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
