Hi, I'd like to know the status about this patch series... :）
Thanks, BRs Xiubo > -----Original Message----- > From: Xiubo Li [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:12 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected] > Cc: Xiubo Li-B47053 > Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] clocksource: fix type confusion for > clocksource_mmio_readX_Y > > The types' definations are: > o cycle_t -> u64 > o readl_relaxed -> u32 > o readw_relaxed -> u16 > > So let clocksource_mmio_readX_Ys return a cast to cycle_t, though > this maybe look reduntant sometimes, it make sense and they will be > more readable and less confusion... > > This patch clarifies the functions type and fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/clocksource/mmio.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/mmio.c b/drivers/clocksource/mmio.c > index c0e2512..19a6b3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/mmio.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/mmio.c > @@ -22,22 +22,22 @@ static inline struct clocksource_mmio > *to_mmio_clksrc(struct clocksource *c) > > cycle_t clocksource_mmio_readl_up(struct clocksource *c) > { > - return readl_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > + return (cycle_t)readl_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > } > > cycle_t clocksource_mmio_readl_down(struct clocksource *c) > { > - return ~readl_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > + return ~(cycle_t)readl_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > } > > cycle_t clocksource_mmio_readw_up(struct clocksource *c) > { > - return readw_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > + return (cycle_t)readw_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > } > > cycle_t clocksource_mmio_readw_down(struct clocksource *c) > { > - return ~(unsigned)readw_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > + return ~(cycle_t)readw_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg); > } > > /** > -- > 1.8.4
