On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:33:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 15:17:17 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 03:28:44PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>>> +
>>> +int setup_output_field(void)
>>> +{
>>> + char *tmp, *tok, *str;
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (field_order == NULL)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + reset_dimensions();
>>
>> Do we want to call this in setup_sorting as well? In case
>> we mix the order of setup_output_field and setup_sorting
>> in the future?
>
> Yeah, looks like a good idea.
Hmm.. I misunderstood your point. The thing is that the initialization
step needs to be done in a specific order (due to their implicit
dependency). So I change it to be called in one place, setup_sorting().
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
