On Tue 20-05-14 18:50:16, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> journal_init_revoke_table is only called with positive hash_size
> (JOURNAL_REVOKE_DEFAULT_HASH) so we can replace loop shift by ilog2
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <[email protected]>
  Thanks. I've merged the patch to my tree.

                                                                Honza
> ---
>  fs/jbd/revoke.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/revoke.c b/fs/jbd/revoke.c
> index 25c713e..8898bbd 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/revoke.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/revoke.c
> @@ -231,19 +231,15 @@ record_cache_failure:
>  
>  static struct jbd_revoke_table_s *journal_init_revoke_table(int hash_size)
>  {
> -     int shift = 0;
> -     int tmp = hash_size;
> +     int i;
>       struct jbd_revoke_table_s *table;
>  
>       table = kmem_cache_alloc(revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!table)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     while((tmp >>= 1UL) != 0UL)
> -             shift++;
> -
>       table->hash_size = hash_size;
> -     table->hash_shift = shift;
> +     table->hash_shift = ilog2(hash_size);
>       table->hash_table =
>               kmalloc(hash_size * sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!table->hash_table) {
> @@ -252,8 +248,8 @@ static struct jbd_revoke_table_s 
> *journal_init_revoke_table(int hash_size)
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -     for (tmp = 0; tmp < hash_size; tmp++)
> -             INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->hash_table[tmp]);
> +     for (i = 0; i < hash_size; i++)
> +             INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->hash_table[i]);
>  
>  out:
>       return table;
> -- 
> 1.8.4.5
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to