hi,
factoring the elide code to make perf_hpp__should_skip
function cheap call/check again.

Also I was wondering.. do we want to get rid of sort_entry
structs in favor of perf_hpp__* stuff? Any plans?

I'm sending this a RFC, since any other such refactoring
would change this stuff for sure as well ;-).

thanks,
jirka


Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Corey Ashford <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c |   8 ++++----
 tools/perf/util/hist.h         |   8 +++++++-
 tools/perf/util/sort.c         | 102 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------------
 tools/perf/util/sort.h         |   2 +-
 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to