On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT"
> pull-request
> but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a
> configuration
> option).
Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
> This pull-request depends on:
> - the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
> 3.15-rc6 tag.
> - the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
> So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
> before adding the material for this pull-request.
>
> About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
> while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
> nodes as they had been written by Boris.
> As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
> when Mark gives his point of view.
Ok. I've merged it into next/dt now.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
