Am 28.05.2014 15:38, schrieb Michael Welling:
> Looking at the Linux next version, I am fairly certian that the following is
> redundant checking:
>                 if (chips < 0) {
>                         dev_err(&spi->dev, "FATAL: invalid negative chip 
> id\n");
>                         goto fail;
>                 }
> 
> The chips variable should equal the number of bits in the spi_present_mask 
> variable.
> Or am I missing something?

Can be left out. Was just a paranoid check, because with the missing
increment in the of path it became negative.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Michael Stickel                Tel.   +49 4321 559 56-29
   mycable GmbH                   Fax    +49 4321 559 56-10
   Gartenstrasse 10
   24534 Neumuenster, Germany     Email [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   mycable GmbH, Managing Director: Michael Carstens-Behrens
   USt-IdNr: DE 214 231 199, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 1797 NM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
   intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
   they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error,
   please notify the sender and delete all copies from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to