On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > On May 27, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson > <bjorn.anders...@sonymobile.com> wrote: > >> This series adds a regulator driver for the Resource Power Manager found in >> Qualcomm 8660, 8960 and 8064 based devices. >> >> The RPM driver exposes resources to its child devices, that can be accessed >> to >> implement drivers for the regulators, clocks and bus frequency control that's >> owned by the RPM in these devices. > > Rather than adding yet another mfd driver, how about we put this in > drivers/soc/qcom as a much better location for the low level rpm code. Some > code already merged in arm-soc for creation of drivers/soc/qcom/
Hi Kumar, I do see rpm as somewhat equivalent to a pmic and that was why I followed suite and put it in mfd, but I can of course move it if you prefer. Lately I've been working on rpm, rpm-smd, smem, smd, smsm, smp2p patches for mainline. It could be argued that smd is a bus and should go in drivers/bus, but for the rest I fear that we just created drivers/soc/qcom as another dumping ground for things; a "Qualcomm specific drivers/mfd". But maybe that is the purpose of it ;) If I move the rpm driver, are there any conclusion to where I should move the dt binding documentation? Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
