3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> commit e0fc17a936334c08b2729fff87168c03fdecf5b6 upstream. The git commit a945928ea2709bc0e8e8165d33aed855a0110279 ('xen: Do not enable spinlocks before jump_label_init() has executed') was added to deal with the jump machinery. Earlier the code that turned on the jump label was only called by Xen specific functions. But now that it had been moved to the initcall machinery it gets called on Xen, KVM, and baremetal - ouch!. And the detection machinery to only call it on Xen wasn't remembered in the heat of merge window excitement. This means that the slowpath is enabled on baremetal while it should not be. Reported-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks disabled\n"); return; } - + printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n"); pv_lock_ops.lock_spinning = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_lock_spinning); pv_lock_ops.unlock_kick = xen_unlock_kick; } @@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static __init int xen_init_spinlocks_jum if (!xen_pvspin) return 0; + if (!xen_domain()) + return 0; + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_ticketlocks_enabled); return 0; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
