On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 07:40:57 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> - It assumes that syscall numbers are between 0 and 2048. > >> > > There could well be a bug here. Not questioning that. Although that > > would be patch 1/2 > > Even with patch 1, it still doesn't handle large syscall numbers -- it > just assumes they're not audited.
All syscalls must be auditable. Meaning that if an arch goes above 2048, then we'll need to do some math to get it to fall back within the range. > >> - It's unclear whether it's supposed to be reliable. > >> > > Unclear to whom? > > To me. > > If some inode access or selinux rule triggers an audit, is the auditsc > code guaranteed to write an exit record? And see below... It should or indicate that it could not. -Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
