On Thu, 29 May 2014, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Well yes and I am tying directly into that scheme there in cpu.c to > > display the active vmstat threads in sysfs. so its the same. > > I don't think so. Or is there something in vmstat that cpumask_var_t > definition depends upon?
This patch definitely ties the vmstat cpumask into the scheme in cpu.c > > I would like to have some way to display the activities on cpus in /sysfs > > like I have done here with the active vmstat workers. > > > > What I think we need is display cpumasks for > > > > 1. Cpus where the tick is currently off > > 2. Cpus that have dynticks enabled. > > 3. Cpus that are idle > > You should find all that in /proc/timer_list True. I could actually drop the vmstat cpumask support. > Now for CPUs that have full dynticks enabled, we probably need something > in sysfs. We could dump the nohz cpumask somewhere. For now you can only grep > the dmesg There is a nohz mode in /proc/timer_list right? > > 4. Cpus that are used for RCU. > > So, you mean those that aren't in extended grace period (between > rcu_user_enter()/exit > or rcu_idle_enter/exit)? No I mean cpus that have their RCU processing directed to another processor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
