Hi Alexander,
> The reasoning to do this is the following:
>
> - If a timeout occurs, the HCI-communication is broken afterwards and the
> dongle isn't usable anymore.
> - If it works after e.g. waiting 4s everyone is still happy but if it
> just breaks after only waiting 2s nothing is gained.
> - Having to wait some more seconds until an error occurs doesn't change
> anything.
>
> So there is no disadvantage in rasing the timeout but a great advantage
> in case the dongle needs more than 2s to process an HCI command.
> E.g. I had sometimes HCI command timeouts at boot (but never after the BT
> stack
> was successfull started). I assume the reason might be the USB-probing which
> happend before through the bootloader, which might have confused the dongle
> such that it needs a bit more time, but I'm not sure.
>
> Together with the patch which limits the timeout only to the actual time the
> dongle needs to process an HCI command (and doesn't include the time the
> kernel needs to process the answer to an HCI command), my problems were gone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <hol...@ahsoftware.de>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> index be150cf..d50fd34 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ enum {
> #define HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000) /* 2 seconds */
> #define HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(60000) /* 60 seconds */
> #define HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(10000) /* 10 seconds */
> -#define HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000) /* 2 seconds */
> +#define HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(8000) /* 8 seconds */
> #define HCI_ACL_TX_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(45000) /* 45 seconds */
> #define HCI_AUTO_OFF_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000) /* 2 seconds */
> #define HCI_POWER_OFF_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(5000) /* 5 seconds */
I think moving the command timeout handling into a delayed work struct might
actually solve this problem nicely and does not force us to increase the
timeout. A chip that does not respond for 8 seconds is a pretty bad chip.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
