3.11.10.11 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryo...@inktank.com>

commit 42dd037c08c7cd6e3e9af7824b0c1d063f838885 upstream.

Doing rbd_obj_request_put() in rbd_img_request_fill() error paths is
not only insufficient, but also triggers an rbd_assert() in
rbd_obj_request_destroy():

    Assertion failure in rbd_obj_request_destroy() at line 1867:

    rbd_assert(obj_request->img_request == NULL);

rbd_img_obj_request_add() adds obj_requests to the img_request, the
opposite is rbd_img_obj_request_del().  Use it.

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7327

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryo...@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <el...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriq...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 1af45c286501..eebf3d6ec8db 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ out_partial:
        rbd_obj_request_put(obj_request);
 out_unwind:
        for_each_obj_request_safe(img_request, obj_request, next_obj_request)
-               rbd_obj_request_put(obj_request);
+               rbd_img_obj_request_del(img_request, obj_request);
 
        return -ENOMEM;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to