On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:55:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 June 2014 20:23, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, we would need to look at what the drivers were doing and figure > > out something sensible - it really depends why they're trying to set the > > regulator and what would happen if it doesn't work. > For example, few cpufreq drivers are calling it during frequency > transition and are checking return value as well.. And fail if it failed. > One way out might be checking if pointer to regulator is valid or not > and only call it if pointer is not NULL.. No, as I've explained repeatedly NULL is a perfectly valid regulator and that's not going to work reliably. As I've previously requested please think about what happens to cpufreq if we fail to ramp voltages.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
