On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:55:02PM -0700, Francesco Ruggeri wrote: > @@ -719,6 +719,11 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_get_device(unsigned > struct pci_dev *pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device, > unsigned int ss_vendor, unsigned int ss_device, > struct pci_dev *from); > +struct pci_dev *pci_get_device_noref(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int > device, > + struct pci_dev *from); > +struct pci_dev *pci_get_subsys_noref(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int > device, > + unsigned int ss_vendor, unsigned int > ss_device, > + struct pci_dev *from);
To follow up, what drivers are you thinking need to make these calls? Perhaps they shouldn't be doing something like this? And, to answer my previous question, the reason PCI is different is that drivers want to walk the list of devices to find "stupid" things like this out, USB doesn't do dumb stuff like that :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
