On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:19:57PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/06/04 20:31), Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:25:02PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> (2014/06/04 5:38), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> Now trying to reference a bogus member name:
> >>>
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# perf probe 'vfs_getname=getname_flags:65 
> >>> pathname=result->BOGUS:string'
> >>> result(type:filename) has no member BOGUS.
> >>> Failed to find 'result' in this function.
> >>>   Error: Failed to add events. (-22)
> >>> [root@zoo ~]#
> >>>
> >>> No segfault, albeit it produces a bogus error message, as it clearly
> >>> _finds_ the 'result' variable, its just that it is of a struct type that
> >>> _has_ no such 'BOGUS' _member_.
> >>
> >> Right, I'll fix that.
> > 
> > should I wait for new patchset, or should I take those 2?
> 
> No, those 2 patches are urgently required, because one fixes SEGV critical
> error, and the other fixes a wrong behavior (catch up to the latest
> dwarf), which is also degradation.

ok, I'll queue both of them to perf/urgent

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to