Usually, pmus that do, for example, instruction tracing, would only ever
be able to have one event per task per cpu (or per perf_context). For such
pmus it makes sense to disallow creating conflicting events early on, so
as to provide consistent behavior for the user.

This patch adds a pmu capability that indicates such constraint on event
creation.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  1 +
 kernel/events/core.c       | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 3d68411..b6f7408 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ struct pmu {
 #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT      1
 #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG         2
 #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_SW_DOUBLEBUF  4
+#define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE         8
 
 /**
  * enum perf_event_active_state - the states of a event
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 48ad31b..9783c60 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7113,6 +7113,32 @@ out:
        return ret;
 }
 
+static bool exclusive_event_match(struct perf_event *e1, struct perf_event *e2)
+{
+       if ((e1->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE) &&
+           (e1->cpu == e2->cpu ||
+            e1->cpu == -1 ||
+            e2->cpu == -1))
+               return true;
+       return false;
+}
+
+static bool exclusive_event_ok(struct perf_event *event,
+                             struct perf_event_context *ctx)
+{
+       struct perf_event *iter_event;
+
+       if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE))
+               return true;
+
+       list_for_each_entry(iter_event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+               if (exclusive_event_match(iter_event, event))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * sys_perf_event_open - open a performance event, associate it to a task/cpu
  *
@@ -7261,6 +7287,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
                goto err_alloc;
        }
 
+       if (!exclusive_event_ok(event, ctx)) {
+               err = -EBUSY;
+               goto err_context;
+       }
+
        if (task) {
                put_task_struct(task);
                task = NULL;
@@ -7427,6 +7458,13 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct perf_event_attr 
*attr, int cpu,
                goto err_free;
        }
 
+       if (!exclusive_event_ok(event, ctx)) {
+               perf_unpin_context(ctx);
+               put_ctx(ctx);
+               err = -EBUSY;
+               goto err_free;
+       }
+
        WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
        mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
        perf_install_in_context(ctx, event, cpu);
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to