On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:45 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We want to be a bit more clever in futex_lock_pi_atomic() and separate
> the possible states. Split out the waiter verification into a separate
> function. No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

Reviewed for functional equivalence.

Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dar...@dvhart.com>


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to