From: Tyler Hall <tylerwh...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:23:16 -0400
> Use schedule_work() to avoid potentially taking the spinlock in
> interrupt context.
>
> Commit cc9fa74e2a ("slip/slcan: added locking in wakeup function") added
> necessary locking to the wakeup function and 367525c8c2/ddcde142be ("can:
> slcan: Fix spinlock variant") converted it to spin_lock_bh() because the lock
> is also taken in timers.
>
> Disabling softirqs is not sufficient, however, as tty drivers may call
> write_wakeup from interrupt context. This driver calls tty->ops->write() with
> its spinlock held, which may immediately cause an interrupt on the same CPU
> and
> subsequent spin_bug().
>
> Simply converting to spin_lock_irq/irqsave() prevents this deadlock, but
> causes lockdep to point out a possible circular locking dependency
> between these locks:
>
> (&(&sl->lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: slip_write_wakeup
> (&port_lock_key){-.....}, at: serial8250_handle_irq.part.13
>
> The slip transmit is holding the slip spinlock when calling the tty write.
> This grabs the port lock. On an interrupt, the handler grabs the port
> lock and calls write_wakeup which grabs the slip lock. This could be a
> problem if a serial interrupt occurs on another CPU during the slip
> transmit.
>
> To deal with these issues, don't grab the lock in the wakeup function by
> deferring the writeout to a workqueue. Also hold the lock during close
> when de-assigning the tty pointer to safely disarm the worker and
> timers.
>
> This bug is easily reproducible on the first transmit when slip is
> used with the standard 8250 serial driver.
...
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hall <tylerwh...@gmail.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
