On 2014/06/16, 11:43 PM, "Anil Belur" <ask...@gmail.com> wrote:
>From: Anil Belur <ask...@gmail.com>
>
>fixed: WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (32, 32)
>Signed-off-by: Anil Belur <ask...@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
>b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
>index e2da397..3b2b995 100644
>--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
>+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
>@@ -825,8 +825,8 @@ int ccc_prep_size(const struct lu_env *env, struct
>cl_object *obj,
> loff_t size_index = ((size - 1) >>
> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
>
> if ((size == 0 && cur_index != 0) ||
>- (size_index < cur_index))
>- *exceed = 1;
>+ (size_index < cur_index))
The old indentation of this line (aligned after '(' on the previous line)
was better. Note also that there is no need for parenthesis around this
statement.
>+ *exceed = 1;
> }
> return result;
> } else {
>--
>1.9.0
>
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
