Kamal, On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:43 -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > 3.13.11.4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > ------------------ > > From: Paul Bolle <[email protected]> > > commit 7919010c4224e07b871f3b5513d245cc029fcd67 upstream. > > Nothing cares about ACPI_PROCFS. This has been the case since v2.6.38. > This Kconfig symbol serves no purpose and its help text is now > misleading. It can safely be removed. If this symbol would be needed > again in the future it can be readded in a commit that adds code that > actually uses it. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > [ kamal: 3.13-stable prereq for > e2a7c3d ACPI: Revert "ACPI: Remove CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER and cm_sbsc.c" ]
I'm curious: how can this patch - which is straightforward cleanup, without any further impact - be a prerequisite for a revert, or anything else, for that matter? > Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
