On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 01:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't think there is a need for a global stop_machine()-like > synchronization here. The printing CPU will be sending IPI to the CPU N+1 > only after it has finished printing CPU N stacktrace. So you plan on sending an IPI to a CPU then wait for it to acknowledge that it is spinning, and then print out the data and then tell the CPU it can stop spinning? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
