Hi!
> > > Isn't some Kconfig solution appropriate here?
> >
> > Yes, but only for the CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC case, it does not solve the
> > "cpu has no PSE" case for VIA CPUs. So the Kconfig solution is an extra
> > bonus.
>
> Note that I've posted a Kconfig solution here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111017249931972&w=2
>
> Regarding Pavel's patch, it seems to me that it might be better to print
> the message at boot time, instead of (or in addition to?) his patch.
> Maybe we should be disabling swsusp altogether at boot in that case, if
> that's not unreasonably hard to implement.
Hmm, yes, that would certainly be better. It would need new
per-architecture hook... Feel free to implement it.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
