On 06/30/2014 03:18 PM, Christopher Friedt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Christopher Friedt > <chrisfri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That sounds a bit more accurate. Should kms and fbdev be setting both >> registers then? > I wonder if fbdev can use PITCHLOCK as well, rather than > BYTES_PER_LINE. I will only be able to run both kms and fbdev > functional tests about 9 hours from now, so any discussion until then > is welcome
Please see the previous message I sent. If you just remove the line that sets BYTES_PER_LINE, fbdev will have called into the kms code to set PITCHLOCK correctly. /Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
