From: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> Add WARN_ON's into uprobe_unregister() and uprobe_apply() to ensure that nobody tries to play with the dead uprobe/consumer. This helps to catch the bugs like the one fixed by the previous patch.
In the longer term we should fix this poorly designed interface. uprobe_register() should return "struct uprobe *" which should be passed to apply/unregister. Plus other semantic changes, see the changelog in commit 41ccba029e94. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140627170140.ga18...@redhat.com Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> --- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c index c445e392e93f..6f3254e8c137 100644 --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *u { int err; - if (!consumer_del(uprobe, uc)) /* WARN? */ + if (WARN_ON(!consumer_del(uprobe, uc))) return; err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, NULL); @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, int ret = -ENOENT; uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset); - if (!uprobe) + if (WARN_ON(!uprobe)) return ret; down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem); @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume struct uprobe *uprobe; uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset); - if (!uprobe) + if (WARN_ON(!uprobe)) return; down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem); -- 2.0.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
