We do not need to block on ->node_write among different node page writers e.g.
fsync/flush, unless we have a node page writer from write_checkpoint.
So it's better use rw_semaphore instead of mutex type for ->node_write to
promote performance.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
---
 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |    6 +++---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |    2 +-
 fs/f2fs/node.c       |    4 ++--
 fs/f2fs/super.c      |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 0b4710c..eec406b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -714,10 +714,10 @@ retry_flush_dents:
         * until finishing nat/sit flush.
         */
 retry_flush_nodes:
-       mutex_lock(&sbi->node_write);
+       down_write(&sbi->node_write);
 
        if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES)) {
-               mutex_unlock(&sbi->node_write);
+               up_write(&sbi->node_write);
                sync_node_pages(sbi, 0, &wbc);
                goto retry_flush_nodes;
        }
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ retry_flush_nodes:
 
 static void unblock_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
-       mutex_unlock(&sbi->node_write);
+       up_write(&sbi->node_write);
        f2fs_unlock_all(sbi);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index ae3b4ac..ca30b5a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
        struct inode *meta_inode;               /* cache meta blocks */
        struct mutex cp_mutex;                  /* checkpoint procedure lock */
        struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem;           /* blocking FS operations */
-       struct mutex node_write;                /* locking node writes */
+       struct rw_semaphore node_write;         /* locking node writes */
        struct mutex writepages;                /* mutex for writepages() */
        bool por_doing;                         /* recovery is doing or not */
        wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index a90f51d..7b5b5de 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1231,12 +1231,12 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page,
        if (wbc->for_reclaim)
                goto redirty_out;
 
-       mutex_lock(&sbi->node_write);
+       down_read(&sbi->node_write);
        set_page_writeback(page);
        write_node_page(sbi, page, &fio, nid, ni.blk_addr, &new_addr);
        set_node_addr(sbi, &ni, new_addr, is_fsync_dnode(page));
        dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
-       mutex_unlock(&sbi->node_write);
+       up_read(&sbi->node_write);
        unlock_page(page);
        return 0;
 
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 8f96d93..bed9413 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void 
*data, int silent)
        mutex_init(&sbi->gc_mutex);
        mutex_init(&sbi->writepages);
        mutex_init(&sbi->cp_mutex);
-       mutex_init(&sbi->node_write);
+       init_rwsem(&sbi->node_write);
        sbi->por_doing = false;
        spin_lock_init(&sbi->stat_lock);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to