On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:28:32AM +0000, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dominik Karall wrote: > > >>>> which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives > >>>> that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that > >>>> way in the future. > >>> > >>> IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt > >>> againt > >>> the last -rc but against 2.6.x. > >> > >> It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against 2.6.11.1 sounds most > >> logical to me. > > > > I don't think so. The latest patch (2.6.11.2 now) is on the frontpage of > > kernel.org, so IMHO the user should not need to search the kernel.org/pub > > archives to get 2.6.11.1 patch before he can start working with 2.6.11.2. > > > > I think it's a small problem too, that 2.6.11 source isn't directly > > accessable > > through the kernel.org frontpage while there is no "full tarball" of > > 2.6.11.X > > trees. > > With that "full tarball" for 2.6.11.X the issues would be over. > I think there should be one.
There is one, did you not look? kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.2.tar.gz thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/