On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 07:56:54AM +0100, Z Lim wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote:
> > Does this sound remotely feasible?
>
> So I looked at insn.c and the only overlap at this point is B/BL codegen.
> A whole lot more, e.g. arithmetic, logical, and memory ops, will need
> to be shuffled in.
Yup, the more the merrier. I just want to avoid having N subtley different
encoders/decoders, as this stuff tends to be hard to review and easy to make
small mistakes.
> Let me address Alexei's review comments and send out a v2.
> After that, I can take a stab at consolidating bpf_jit.h into
> insn.{c,h}. Sounds good to you?
Perfect.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
