(2014/07/07 9:19), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On 07/07/2014 01:21 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
When hot-adding and onlining CPU, kernel panic occurs, showing following
call trace.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001d08
IP: [<ffffffff8114acfd>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x9d/0xb10
PGD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
...
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff812b8745>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x35/0x50
[<ffffffff810a3283>] ? find_busiest_group+0x113/0x8f0
[<ffffffff81193bc9>] ? deactivate_slab+0x349/0x3c0
[<ffffffff811926f1>] new_slab+0x91/0x300
[<ffffffff815de95a>] __slab_alloc+0x2bb/0x482
[<ffffffff8105bc1c>] ? copy_process.part.25+0xfc/0x14c0
[<ffffffff810a3c78>] ? load_balance+0x218/0x890
[<ffffffff8101a679>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff81105ba9>] ? trace_clock_local+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff81193d1c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x8c/0x200
[<ffffffff8105bc1c>] copy_process.part.25+0xfc/0x14c0
[<ffffffff81114d0d>] ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit+0x4d/0x60
[<ffffffff81085a80>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[<ffffffff8105d0ec>] do_fork+0xbc/0x360
[<ffffffff8105d3b6>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30
[<ffffffff81086652>] kthreadd+0x2c2/0x300
[<ffffffff81086390>] ? kthread_create_on_cpu+0x60/0x60
[<ffffffff815f20ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81086390>] ? kthread_create_on_cpu+0x60/0x60
In my investigation, I found the root cause is wq_numa_possible_cpumask.
All entries of wq_numa_possible_cpumask is allocated by
alloc_cpumask_var_node(). And these entries are used without initializing.
So these entries have wrong value.
When hot-adding and onlining CPU, wq_update_unbound_numa() is called.
wq_update_unbound_numa() calls alloc_unbound_pwq(). And alloc_unbound_pwq()
calls get_unbound_pool(). In get_unbound_pool(), worker_pool->node is set
as follow:
#kernel/workqueue.c
3592 /* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that
node */
3593 if (wq_numa_enabled) {
3594 for_each_node(node) {
3595 if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
3596
wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
3597 pool->node = node;
3598 break;
3599 }
3600 }
3601 }
But wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node] does not have correct cpumask. So, wrong
node is selected. As a result, kernel panic occurs.
By this patch, all entries of wq_numa_possible_cpumask are allocated by
zalloc_cpumask_var_node to initialize them. And the panic disappeared.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <[email protected]>
Hi, Yasuaki
All cpumasks in the wq_numa_possible_cpumask array are allocated in
wq_numa_init():
for_each_node(node)
BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var_node(&tbl[node], GFP_KERNEL,
node_online(node) ? node : NUMA_NO_NODE));
[snip...]
wq_numa_possible_cpumask = tbl;
I didn't find out how does this patch make the all entries of
wq_numa_possible_cpumask zeroed.
Sorry. I mistook. I will resend soon.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu.
Or I misunderstood.
Thanks,
Lai
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6203d29..b393ded 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3338,7 +3338,7 @@ struct workqueue_attrs *alloc_workqueue_attrs(gfp_t
gfp_mask)
attrs = kzalloc(sizeof(*attrs), gfp_mask);
if (!attrs)
goto fail;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&attrs->cpumask, gfp_mask))
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&attrs->cpumask, gfp_mask))
goto fail;
cpumask_copy(attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
