From cf37d0cc4d51da5c0b368e1f5ab05082c041d1e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.korni...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:08:45 +0400
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] Add force_epp module option for parport_pc.

The detection of Intel EPP bug is known to produce much false positives.
The new option is introduced to force enable EPP in spite of the test result.

Tested-by: Heiko Andreas Sommer <hsom...@eso.org>
Signed-off-by: Matwey V. Kornilov <mat...@sai.msu.ru>
---
 drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
index a6eaafb..fb7530d 100644
--- a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
@@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ static int user_specified;
        (defined(CONFIG_PARPORT_1284) && defined(CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO))
 static int verbose_probing;
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARPORT_1284
+static int force_epp;
+#endif
 static int pci_registered_parport;
 static int pnp_registered_parport;

@@ -1764,7 +1767,7 @@ static int parport_EPP_supported(struct parport *pb)
                return 0;  /* No way to clear timeout */

        /* Check for Intel bug. */
-       if (intel_bug_present(pb))
+       if (!force_epp && intel_bug_present(pb))
                return 0;

        pb->modes |= PARPORT_MODE_EPP;
@@ -3147,6 +3150,10 @@ module_param_array(dma, charp, NULL, 0);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(verbose_probing, "Log chit-chat during initialisation");
 module_param(verbose_probing, int, 0644);
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARPORT_1284
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_epp, "Force EPP enabling when buggy hardware found by the 
module checks");
+module_param(force_epp, int, 0);
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
 static char *init_mode;
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(init_mode,
--
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to