3.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>

commit 472b909ff6f4884d235ef7b9d3847fad5efafbff upstream.

This is a regression from my patch a26e8c9f75b0bfd8cccc9e8f110737b136eb5994, we
need to only unlock the block if we were the one who locked it.  Otherwise this
will trip BUG_ON()'s in locking.c  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -368,7 +368,8 @@ static int verify_parent_transid(struct
 out:
        unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, eb->start, eb->start + eb->len - 1,
                             &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
-       btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);
+       if (need_lock)
+               btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);
        return ret;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to