Nick, Please don't top-post. I've fixed it up ...
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:22:13AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: > >> Here are my logs of the builds attached with warnings if they succeed > >> for now failing arm configs > >> according to the tests here, > > > > fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘__blockdev_direct_IO’: > > fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘to’ may be used uninitialized in this > > function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > > u = (to - from) >> blkbits; > > > > OK, do you see why this is a false positive? And why asking the > > thousands of people "in the commmunity" to all do exactly the same > > evaluation is a massive waste of time? I already sent a patch explaining it was a false-positive and silencing the warning: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1956499 > In addition all the arm configs that were failing for linux next to > compile that didn't succeed are succeeded as of now. That seems useful > to tell the arm developers. We already have a buildbot running and automated boot testing. The mailinglist is here: http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports Links to the reports are in the emails. Please review and see if there is anything we're missing. Please keep in mind this is a volunteer task for those currently running it. Contributions would be much more appreciated than good ideas ;-) thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
